Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Bebi,
- Citation Analysis of Ph.D. Theses Submitted to the University of Delhi in Social Sciences during 1995-2008
Abstract Views :453 |
PDF Views:17
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007, IN
2 14 F Vikrant Apartments, Sector 13, Rohini, Delhi 110 085, IN
1 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007, IN
2 14 F Vikrant Apartments, Sector 13, Rohini, Delhi 110 085, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 51, No 6 (2014), Pagination: 363-368Abstract
The study presents an analysis of citation pattern of Ph.D. theses in social sciences awarded by the University of Delhi during 1995-2008. The study identifies how the pattern of submissions has changed during 1995-2008 in different disciplines of social sciences, besides studying distribution of citations by document types, pattern of authorship of cited documents, cited Indian and foreign authors and chronological distribution of citations. The ranked lists of core journals also have been presented. The analysis reveals that 51,889 citations were made to 259 theses in social sciences. The analysis of these citations shows that books are the most preferred source of citations in all disciplines except economics and constitutes about 55.5% of total citations. The authorship pattern reveals that single authored citations constitute about 86 per cent citations. The chronological distribution of citations shows that the period ranging from 1991 to 2000 is the most cited period. The analyses of journals ranking shows that Economic and Political Weekly published from India is the most cited journal.Keywords
Citation Analysis, Social Science, Ph.D. Theses, University of Delhi, Journal Ranking.- Bibliometrics of Information Technology:Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow
Abstract Views :287 |
PDF Views:31
Authors
Affiliations
1 CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies (CSIR-NISTADS), Dr K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110012, IN
2 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Delhi, Maurice Nagar, Delhi − 110007, IN
3 Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Technology, Sector 22, Rohini, Delhi − 100086, IN
1 CSIR-National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies (CSIR-NISTADS), Dr K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110012, IN
2 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Delhi, Maurice Nagar, Delhi − 110007, IN
3 Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Technology, Sector 22, Rohini, Delhi − 100086, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 54, No 6 (2017), Pagination: 277-284Abstract
The study presents a bibliometric analysis of 270 papers presented at the international conference “Information Technology: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow” organized by the Defence Scientific Information and Documentation Center (DESIDOC), Delhi, of the Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO) during February 19-21, 2015. The study indicates that more than half of the total presentation was contributed by academic institutions (universities and colleges). Distribution of contributions by country and Indian States indicates that out of 270 papers, only seven were from foreign countries and rest 263 from India. Delhi topped the list among the contributing cities, while DESIDOC topped the list among the contributing institutions. Output of authors by gender indicates that male authors contributed more than female authors. The distribution of references cited in the papers shows that among the different information sources, journal citations were the highest and highest number of cited journals was in the discipline of library and information science. The highest number of cited journals was being published from the USA.Keywords
Artificial Intelligence, Bibliometrics, Conference, Digital Services, Electronic Resources, Information Technology, Networking.References
- Ali A. (2006). Ane’s Encyclopedic Dictionary of Library and Information Science,1, New Delhi, Ane Books India, p.206.
- Kumar A, Prakasan ER, Kalyane VL and Kumar V. (2008).Pramana: A Journal of Physics, Annals of Library and Information Studies. 55(1): 201−11.
- Garg KC, Sharma P and Kumar S. (2008) Scientometric profile of the journal Mausam, Annals of Library and Information Studies. 55(1):76−80.
- Kumar M and Moorthy AL. (2011). Bibliometric analysis of DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology during 2001-2010, DESIDOC J. Lib. and Inf. Technol.31(3):203−08.
- Garg KC and Anjana AK. (2014). Journal of intellectual property rights: A bibliometric study, DESIDOC J. Lib. and Inf. Technol. 34(1):66−73.
- Bartneck C and Hu J. (2009). Scientometric analysis of the CHI proceedings. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI2009), Boston, p. 699−708. DOI: Crossref.
- Shamir L. (2010). The Effect of Conference Proceedings on the Scholarly Communication in Computer Science and Engineering. Scholarly and Research Communication. 1(2).Retrieved on 10 March, 2017. Available at: www.src-online.ca. Crossref.
- Lisee C, Lariviere V and Archambault E. (2008). Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(11):1776–84. Crossref.
- Garg KC and Kavita. (2015). A Bibliometric study, Papers presented at the International Conference The Role of Science and Technology in Global Development, LIS Links, 1(4):2−8.
- Garg KC and Bebi. (2015). Content to connectivity: Paradigm shifts in knowledge innovation, information representation, information management systems and librarianship, Library Herald. 53(4):414−23. Crossref.
- Garg KC, Dutt B and Kumar S. (2006). Scientometric profile of Indian science as seen through Science Citation Index, Annals of Library and Information Studies.53(3):114−25.
- Madani S., Carnevale RJ, Duda S, Feyder M and Aronsky D.(2006). Prevalence and inaccessibility of URLs in the biomedical literature. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, p. 1019. American Medical Informatics Association, 2006. PMCid: PMC1839732.
- Research Output of Women Faculty Members in Physics:A Scientometric Study of Select Central Universities
Abstract Views :268 |
PDF Views:20
Authors
Bebi
1,
Shailendra Kumar
1
Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Delhi, Delhi − 110007, IN
1 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Delhi, Delhi − 110007, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 55, No 2 (2018), Pagination: 92-97Abstract
This paper examines the research output of women faculty in physics in 10 central universities in India. The data was collected for the period of 2011-15 (5 years). A total of 36 women physics faculty members contributed 282 papers. The study mainly focused on research output, citations, h-index, i10-index, place of women authors when writing papers jointly, proportion of women authors per paper and the central university with highest number of women authors and papers. The results showed that women authors acted as corresponding author more as compared to first or both (first and corresponding). University of Delhi topped the rank in terms of highest women contributors and papers. The ratio of women authors per article was found 0.3. Journal of Applied Physics was found to be the most preferred journal by women authors in Physics.Keywords
Central Universities, H-Index, I10-Index, India, Physics, Research Output, Women Authors.References
- Accessed on 21-11-2017. http://mhrd.gov.in/universityand-higher-education.
- Altbach Philip G. (2014). What counts for academic productivity in research universities? University World News; 329. Accessed on 22-11-2017. http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20140715105656393.
- Repanovici A. (2010). Measuring the visibility of the University’s scientific production using Google Scholar, “Publish or Perish” software and Scientometrics. Accessed on 22-112017. https://www.ifla.org/past-wlic/2010/155-repanovicien.pdf.
- Marisha, Banshal SK and Singh VK. (2017). Research performance of Central Universities in India, Current Science. 112(11):2198-207.
- Bebi and Kumar S. (2017). Contributions of women faculties in Physics in select Institutions of Delhi: A scientometrics study, DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology. 37(6):410-16. Crossref.
- Kretschmer H, Kundra R, Beaver Donald and deB Kretschmer T. (2012). Gender bias in journals of gender studies, Scientometrics. 93(1):135-50. Crossref.
- Hasan SA, Sharma, MK, Khilnani S and Luthra R. (2012). Research productivity of female research scholars and their migration pattern in pursuit higher education and research, Current Science. 103(6):611–12.
- Amico RD and Vermigli P. (2011). Publication productivity and career advancement by female and male Psychology faculty: The case of Italy, Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. 4(3):175-84. Crossref.